top of page

In-Round Tips

​

Follow your framework first
  • Always go by Value/Criterion (V/C) first, then move through each contention one by one.
     

Use evidence from blocks
  • This is where all your predetermined blocks, arguments, and counter-evidence come into play.
     

  • Each piece of evidence should support your contentions and be ready to respond to likely arguments from your opponent.
     

  • Every evidence you present must be explicitly linked to why you’re right — never assume the judge will make the connection.
     

It’s okay to concede minor points
  • If an opponent makes a claim that doesn’t affect the round’s outcome, it’s fine to acknowledge it.
     

  • Example: “Sure, that’s true, but it has no impact on this round.”
     

  • This demonstrates strategic thinking and keeps your focus on the most important issues.
     

Keep pacing right
  • In impromptu speeches, don’t be afraid to deviate slightly from your flow if needed.
     

  • Clearly state your claim, evidence, link, and impact for each contention.
     

  • Do not drop arguments, as they cannot be brought up later. Always address contentions in your first rebuttal speech.
     

Extend your arguments
  • Do not just restate your case in rebuttals.
     

  • Each contention should now demonstrate new value or impact — explain why this point strengthens your side or outweighs your opponent’s.
     

  • Show the judge the evolving strength of your arguments as the round progresses, rather than repeating what’s already known.
     

  • For example: Your first contention was that AI in art reduces creativity. When extending your case, you will not say: “AI in art reduces creativity, and here’s a restatement of what I said in my 1AC.”
     

    • No, you will instead explain: “In relation to my opponent’s argument on efficiency in art, our argument still stands undefeated due to _____________.”

 
Crystallization
  • Always end your rebuttals by crystallizing the round for the judge.
     

  • Highlight the key reasons you are winning, such as:
     

    • Magnitude – How significant the impact is compared to your opponent’s.
       

    • Scope – How widespread the impact is.
       

    • Probability – How likely the impact is to occur.
       

    • Time frame – How soon or long-term the impact is.
       

  • Crystallization helps a judge who may be tired or hearing repetitive arguments focus on your strongest points.
     

  • In your first and second rebuttals, use crystallization to tie your contentions and evidence back to your Value/Criterion, making the impact clear and showing why your side outweighs the opponent’s.

bottom of page